|
| |
| Helpful
Articles |
| |
| |
Don’t
Forsake Retirement for Home |
 |
| |
Alternatives
to Large Down Payments |
 |
| |
APR
Can Cost You |
 |
| |
Look
Beyond APR in Mortgage Hunt |
 |
| |
Fed
Rate Cuts Do Not Equal Lower Mortgage Rates |
 |
| |
|
Don’t
Forsake Retirement for Home
By Barry Habib
Contributing Editor to CNBC.com
Homebuyers frequently use retirement money toward the down payment
on a house. But think before you leap. Buyers justify this by saying
they want to cut the monthly mortgage payment and have a smaller
mortgage. Buyers also use this tactic to avoid having to take out
what’s known as a jumbo mortgage, which generally comes with
a modestly higher interest rate. Jumbos tend to be classified as
exceeding $300,700. Buyers may also use retirement funds to avoid
private mortgage insurance, PMI, by placing at least a 20% percent
down payment on the home right off the bat.
These are all valid reasons. But do they really justify borrowing
from your future? When it comes to saving for retirement, you usually
end up with more if you defer taxes until you need the money. So
the more tax-deferring you can do, the better. The funds for your
home, if possible, should come from elsewhere.
An example brings the point home:
Take a penny. If you double it, you get two cents, if you double
it two more times you get eight cents. After 30 times, you end
up with a tidy little $5.37 million.
Now do the same exercise, and impose a 28 percent tax on the gain
after each doubling. You end up with $1.32 after 10 doublings and
$67,659 after all 30. That's a nice sum, but not quite $5.37 million.
Unfettered growth really pays off.
This isn’t the only drawback of breaking into the retirement
nest egg. If you take money out of an IRA or 401(k) plan, before
age 59 ½, you likely face a 10 percent penalty from the
IRS on top of whatever the normal taxes are. You can borrow from
these plans, and that may make sense at times, but you have to
pay it back. What’s more, your mortgage lender may restrict
your borrowing ability as a result.
So tinkering with your mortgage may not justify cutting into one
of your most-important employment benefits, which is your 401(k)
plan.
You may other more-attractive alternatives to improve your mortgage.
Investigate the possibility of using a "seller contribution." Here,
the seller can pay your closing costs or build these costs into
the purchase price. This may reduce your need to pull money from
a retirement account. If you cannot put enough money down to avoid
paying PMI, then consider paying the PMI premium rather than tapping
your future. With some appreciation in the value of your home and/or
prepayment of your loan, you can eliminate this fee quickly. If
you want to avoid the slight rate increase that comes with a Jumbo
mortgage, consider taking a second mortgage for the difference.
You should try to max out your 401K, SEP and IRA every year.
After all, you’ll enjoy that new home even more knowing that
your retirement years will be comfortable |
| < Back
to Top > |
| |
| |
|
Alternatives
to Large Down Payments
By Barry Habib
Contributing Editor to CNBC.com
The good news is you have many mortgage options.
That's also the bad news.
Selecting a mortgage is one of the biggest financial decisions
an individual or family can make. So it's crucial to see how your
choice affects your total financial picture. Too many borrowers
shop just for the lowest rate. The Internet has further turned
mortgages into a commodity. The lowest rate on the wrong program
is far more costly than a competitive rate on the program that
best suits your needs.
Rates are important, but you also need to consider a host of other
variables, including taxes, term, fixed vs. adjustable, rate locks
and, perhaps most importantly, the loan amount.
The size of the loan is perhaps the most frequently neglected
question. Buyers commonly shy away from larger mortgages because
they don't understand the alternative uses of their money. Most
people fear debt, sometimes to a fault.
Homebuyers often have better alternatives for their money than
putting it toward the purchase of a house merely to cut the size
of their mortgage. For example, many relatively safe tax-exempt
bond funds pay a better after-tax return than you would get from
paying down your mortgage.
A family in the 28 percent tax bracket actually earns 9.44 percent
(after taxes are figured) on a municipal bond fund paying 6.8 percent.
So at mortgage rates below 9.44 percent, you should take out the
biggest mortgage possible.
Home prices have escalated in recent years. Many homeowners find
themselves with relatively small mortgages relative to the market
value of their homes.
An example here helps bring the point home.
You buy a home valued at $250,000. You can afford to put $150,000
down. That leaves you with a $100,000 mortgage at say 7.5 percent.
You could also put $50,000 down and take out a $200,000 mortgage.
You could take that $100,000 of free cash
and put it into a municipal bond fund yielding 6.8 percent. You’ll
probably end up making more that way in the long run.
Look at it this way; the borrowed $100,000 would cost 7.5 percent
minus the tax deduction (let's say 28 percent) of 2.1 percent,
netting the cost out to 5.4 percent. The difference between the
two options (6.8 percent municipal bond and 5.4 percent net cost
on the mortgage) is 1.4 percent.
The savings on $100,000 would be $1,400
per year. The higher the tax bracket the greater the savings.
Be careful not to borrow more than 80 percent of the value of
your home or you will probably need to pay a monthly private
mortgage insurance premium that would negate the savings. The
mortgage tax deduction ends at $1 million for first mortgage
liens on primary residences. The tax deduction for second liens
is capped at $100,000. Mortgage rates can be slightly higher
for “jumbo” loan amounts; that is, loans over
$300,700. This is the new limit for "Jumbo" loan amounts.
Many other alternatives can be worthwhile. Paying off higher
rate or non-deductible debt can save a lot of money. Individuals
who have chosen more aggressive though riskier approaches have
found them to be very profitable.
The S&P 500 stock index has averaged a return of about 15
percent per year for the past four years. After a capital gains
bite, the net percentage earned after tax would be 12 percent.
This is a much greater return than the 5.4 percent net cost of
borrowing on your mortgage. In fact, the S&P 500 has averaged
a greater than 15% return for the past 30years. That means your
money should double every five years. This can have a dramatic
effect over time. Let’s look at a couple of examples:
I see so many people using a home loan refinance
to save money by lowering their monthly payment. That’s great, but the
monthly savings is often spent frivolously and not used for a long
term, meaningful investment like college or retirement. Think about
keeping your payments the same but borrowing a higher amount. So
if you owe $200,000 and are saving $200 monthly by refinancing,
you could borrow $230,000 and keep the same payment. That $30,000
could be used to invest for your child's college education. Based
upon historic rates of return for the S&P 500, that $30,000
investment would be worth $240,000 in 15 years. That’s a
great way to save for college.
A mortgage is typically the largest single
financial move people make and should be the centerpiece of any
good financial plan. Use it to create wealth for yourself. Let’s
say you planned to take out a loan of $200,000 on a home worth
$350,000. If you instead make a down payment of just $100,000,
you can invest the extra $50,000. At an historic rate of return
of 15% annually, that $50,000 investment would be worth around
$400,000 in 15years. That's enough to pay off the mortgage completely
in half the time and give yourself a bonus of $215,000. Now that's
a nice way to reach your retirement goals.
A mortgage can be a great financial tool. It should
not be obtained the same way you buy a book online. Consult your
mortgage professional, tax specialist or financial planner. It's
your money.
|
| < Back
to Top > |
| |
| |
|
APR Can
Cost You
By Barry Habib
Contributing Editor to CNBC.com
A borrower who is shopping for the best mortgage
rate can easily be seduced by low rate offers that are accompanied
by low Annual Percentage Rates (APR). Federal Law requires that
APR be disclosed along side the actual interest rate…this
is in order to help borrowers make a more informed decision on
their mortgage. The truth is that APR is a very poor way to comparison
shop for a mortgage and can cause borrowers to make costly wrong
decisions.
APR was created in order to provide a way
for borrowers to account for costs associated with the mortgage.
This sounds good because it may not be very easy to choose between
a loan with a lower rate and higher fees or a loan at a higher
rate and low fees. The problem is that the APR calculation makes
some very bad assumptions. First, APR assumes zero inflation
and that the value or buying power of a Dollar today will be
exactly equal to the value of a Dollar 10, 20 even 30 years from
now. Next, the APR calculation assumes that the mortgage will
never be prepaid or paid off. That means no refinancing or selling
the home…highly unlikely since the average life
of a home mortgage loan is less than four years. Just think, about
your own clients. Is it not rare to see the same loan in place
for even 5-years…forget 30-years. The APR calculation does
not consider the value of the money used for fees. So if you spent
thousands of dollars in points or fees to get a lower rate, the
APR calculation does not give any value to the money if it were
not spent on closing costs. Finally, APR does not take tax consequences
into consideration. This can be significant since higher fees on
the mortgage may not be deductible while the higher interest rate
typically is deductible. Moreover, APR can be manipulated, making
it totally worthless.
So how does APR work anyway? I like to explain
it to my clients by using triangles. I often draw two sets of
triangle for my clients to illustrate the difference between
Interest Rate and APR. The reason for the triangle is because
there are 3 sources of input…“Interest
Rate”, “Mortgage Amount” and “Monthly Payment”.
If you know any two of the three, you can calculate the third.
See the triangle below.

Since any two of the three variables allows
you to calculate the third, a $616 monthly payment for a $150,000
mortgage calculates to an interest rate of 6.125%. But the APR
calculation uses different information. The APR calculation only
keeps the “Monthly
Payment” information the same. Instead of the “Mortgage
Amount”, APR uses “Amount Financed”. This is
the “Amount Financed” information on the Truth in Lending
statement. Amount Financed takes into consideration the fees that
are lender imposed. This includes application fees, points, commitment
fees…and interim or per diem interest. So, Amount
Financed is the mortgage amount less any lender fees, points and
interim interest. The more fees, the lower the Amount Financed.
The monthly payment is then calculated as a product of the Amount
Financed to give you the “Annual Percentage Rate” or “APR”.
So the lower the “Amount Financed”, the higher the “APR” is.
Amount Financed can be manipulated by assuming a closing on the
last day instead of the first day of the month. That would increase
the Amount Financed and decrease the APR.

Here is a real example on a $150,000 fixed
rate 30-year mortgage with zero points: Lender “A” (triangle above) is offering
a great low rate of 5.875% and lender “B” (triangle
below) is offering a higher rate of 6.125%.

A closer look shows that Lender “A” is charging $3,000
more in fees than Lender “B”. How do you compare? If
you look at APR, Lender “A” (5.875% with $3,000 higher
fees) has an APR of 6.149%. Lender “B” (6.125% but
a $3,000 savings in fees) has an APR of 6.211%. So according the
APR, Lender A is a better deal even though the fees are $3,000
higher…this is exactly what these high fee lenders are hoping
you look at.
Let’s look at the real story. The payment difference between
the two is $24 per month. So is it worth paying $3,000 in fees
to Lender A in order to save $24 per month? Hardly. It will take
10.5 years for a borrower to just to get back their investment!
A bad choice when you consider that mortgage loans typically are
retired within four years. To make the decision to go with Lender “A” even
worse, if that’s possible, borrowers rarely take the value
of today’s dollars into account. Rather than giving Lender “A” the
windfall of your hard earned $3,000, you should give it to yourself.
Reduce the loan balance on your mortgage by the fees you are saving.
In the example above that would reduce the loan from $150,000 to
$147,000. This makes the payment difference just $6 per month instead
of $24 per month! The true time to break even is really 500 months
(more than 40-years!). So it is impossible to benefit from the
higher fee program from Lender “A” because the maximum
period on the loan is 30 years or 360 months. One more thing…when
you calculate your tax deduction on the payment difference, it
makes even more sense to avoid paying higher non deductible fees.
The obvious correct choice is to go with Lender “B” even
though the APR is lower with Lender “A”.
Bottom line…your clients should forget
APR and think twice about those advertised low rates when they
are accompanied by higher fees. Use the above illustrations to
drive your point home.
|
| < Back
to Top > |
| |
|
Look Beyond
APR in Mortgage Hunt
By Barry Habib
Contributing Editor to CNBC.com
The "annual percentage rate" (APR) listed with any mortgage
generally causes more confusion than it’s worth for most
homebuyers. Making matters worse, most mortgage professionals don’t
really understand it.
An APR calculation is required on mortgage offers to help people
make sense of all the figures flying around. The ultimate goal
is accurate comparative shopping. Unfortunately, some lenders can
and will manipulate APR; and the assumptions used generally make
APR estimates unrealistic.
APR is at best a theoretical statistic. Your mortgage carries
a stated interest rate. But it actually costs more, when you account
for points paid up front and closing costs imposed by the lender.
APR tries to take all this into account. Unfortunately, it usually
does little more than confuse homebuyers. In fact, the calculations
associated with APR frequently scare homebuyers.
Under APR math, you take the loan amount,
which is easy for anyone to understand, and turn it into the "amount
financed."
Let’s look at an example: If you put 10 percent down on
a $200,000 home, the loan amount is $180,000. Let’s say you
pay $5,000 in points and closing costs. That means the amount financed
is $175,000. Homebuyers panic when they see the $175,000, thinking
that they suddenly have to come up with another $5,000 at the last
minute to pay the seller. But in fact, that figure comes up merely
to calculate APR and has no real barring on the transaction.
Another source of confusion and misleading
comparisons stems from what is known as "interim interest." For
various reasons, mortgage payments are almost always timed with
calendar months. So if you close sometime during the month, then
you have to pay that little bit of extra interest until the first
payment is due. Interim interest can alter the APR calculation
by several basis points, but that does not really mean one mortgage
is better than another. It merely means that one closing date
is further away from the end of the month than another. Lenders
can play games with interim interest to get lower hypothetical
APRs on advertised loans. Laws regarding APR actually allow some
wiggle room for this sort of thing. A lender can be off by as
much as 1/8 of a percentage point. Unfortunately, in a competitive
mortgage market that can mean the difference between winning
and losing a customer.
Homebuyers generally aren’t aware
of the faulty assumptions that go into APR calculations. These
assumptions can lead to people taking on the wrong kind of mortgage.
APR math relies on two very bad assumptions:
- APR assumes zero inflation. In other words, $1 today equals
$1 30 years from now.
- APR assumes the homebuyer will never move, prepay, or refinance.
In fact, a typical family stays in the same house about nine
years, and refinances once. That brings the average mortgage duration
down to less than five years.
So most APR assumptions are grossly unrealistic. Adjustable-rate
APR calculations are based on even more assumptions, making them
even less meaningful.
So what do you do? Take a look at the APR, and then forget about
it.
Don’t pay points, unless you plan to stay in the house
for at least 10 years and won’t refinance. Chances are good
you will move before 10 years is up, or you will refinance.
It is much easier to compare different offers
if they don’t
include points. You should focus on the type and amount of the
mortgage, and on the quality of service of the lender. |
| |
|
Fed Rate Cuts Do Not Equal Lower Mortgage Rates
By Barry Habib
Contributing Editor to CNBC.com
So the Federal Reserve may cut rates again. Many mortgage applicants
are calling their mortgage representative and expecting a lower
interest rate. Others who have been waiting to refinance are puzzled
as to why mortgage rates have not moved lower when the Fed cuts
rates. In fact mortgage rates typically move in the opposite direction
from the Fed move. This is difficult to explain to consumers who
have watched a rate reduction by the Fed with no benefit in mortgage
rates.
Is a Fed rate cut really good news for mortgage rates? The facts
may be surprising. The Fed can only control the Discount Rate and
the Fed Funds Rate. This is very different from mortgage rates.
A mortgage rate can be in effect for 30-years, a rate that is set
by the Fed can change from one day to another.
A look at some recent history shows that when the Fed cuts rates
mortgage rates go up…not down. In the late part
of 1998, with mortgage rates around 6.5%, the Fed cut rates 3 times.
Mortgage rates shot up by over 2% during the next year. Then, in
the spring of 2000 and after 6 Fed rate hikes, mortgage rates declined
from 9% to 6.75% over the next 9 months. In 2001 the Fed cut rates
11 times. But mortgage rates were actually higher after the 11
Fed cuts.
Why do mortgage rates seem to defy logic and move contrary to
the Fed direction? Most often it is because Stocks and Bonds compete
for the same investment dollar. So if stocks like the Fed decision
to cut rates and rally, bonds typically worsen. If stocks react
poorly to a Fed rate hike, bonds are usually the beneficiaries.
As bond prices rise, interest rates fall. As bond prices fall,
interest rates rise. The charts accompanying this article show
the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Fannie Mae 6.5% mortgage bond
tend to follow paths that are almost mirror images of each other.
The consistency of this behavior is astounding.
As the Nasdaq moves higher, bond prices move lower causing interest
rates to rise. As the Nasdaq declines, mortgage bonds benefit,
causing mortgage rates to fall. Additionally, and unlike common
opinion, Fed rate cuts have had virtually no direct effect on mortgage
rates. Moreover, it appears that since Fed rate cuts act to stimulate
the Nasdaq, they have a negative effect on mortgage rates.
The bottom line is that it appears mortgage rates will get better
if the stocks sell off and will get worse if the stocks rally.
So it is not necessarily what the Fed does that affects mortgage
rates, it's how the Nasdaq and broader stock market interprets
the Fed's action that will ultimately influence the direction of
mortgage rates. This is because money managers and mutual fund
companies typically keep funds in either stocks or bonds with very
little in cash. If stocks are in favor, money is pulled from bonds,
causing bond prices to drop and interest rates to rise. When stocks
are being sold off, the money is then parked into bonds, which
improves bond prices and causes interest rates to decline.

On the chart of the Nasdaq Composite Index above, notice how the
price movement higher on the Nasdaq seems to correlate to mortgage
bond price deterioration (shown below) and vice versa. Once again,
lower bond prices translate to higher mortgage rates and higher
mortgage bond prices mean lower mortgage rates.
The chart below shows how the Fannie Mae 6.5% mortgage bond has
performed during the same time period. The green circles indicate
Fed rate cuts and the area circled in red shows when the Fed hiked
rates.

A closer look at the 11 rate cuts by the Fed last year (see chart
below) shows that mortgage bond prices deteriorated after each
Fed rate cut. This means that mortgage rates rose after the Fed
had cut rates while many consumers were expecting their mortgage
rates to decline. Worse yet are the consumers who missed the opportunity
to obtain a lower rate because they mistakenly waited for the anticipated
Fed action to cut short-term rates, thinking that longer-term mortgage
rates would decline as a result.

Predicting the future is tough, so nothing is written in stone.
Keep an eye on the stock market, and keep in mind that the best
rates may be behind us. But, mortgage rates are still low and could
have some quick dips so make the most of them while they last.
|
| |
|